Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Maddison Inglis vs Maia Lumsden Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Inglis vs Lumsden analysis and find out who is favored!
Want To Bet On The P1 vs P2 Match?
After checking out our Predictions and stats analysis, we recommend opening accounts at several Sportsbooks so you can get the best possible odds for the outcome. We recommend:
BetOnline
Our favorite for great odds and reliable service with a 50% Welcome Bonus (up to $1000) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Bwin
Best for European users. Regional Welcome BonusesBetMGM
First bet offer, Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t winSportsBetting
Competitive odds. First Deposit Doubled (up to $500) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Cashwin
:Variety of betting options and 100% Welcome Bonus + 3 Months FREE Matchstat*- Bet365:
With competitive odds and live betting. Regional signup bonuses!
* To claim FREE Matchstat for 3 months – Click Here
If you’re not ready for real bets and want to practice, sign up for FREE at www.meerkatbet.com Enjoy simulated betting with our virtual currency, learn about value bets, and compete for monthly prizes in a risk-free environment.
Maddison Inglis vs Maia Lumsden Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Inglis 1 - 0 Lumsden
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Inglis has won 46.7% of points on their second serve, while Lumsden has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Inglis, in recent form, has won 54.71% of their opponent's second serve points, while Lumsden has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 40.46% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Inglis has saved 54.69% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Lumsden has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Inglis has won 58.93% of matches played (W/L 33/ 23), with Lumsden winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Inglis has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 61% (W/L 33/ 21), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2). Lumsden has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 63% (W/L 75/ 45), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 25% (W/L 5/ 15).
- Player level: In the last year, Inglis has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 60.87% of matches (W/L 28/ 18), where as Lumsden has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/ 1). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Inglis winning 1 times and Lumsden being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Inglis winning 2 and Lumsden winning 0. The last match between Inglis and Lumsden was at the W100 Ilkley, 18-06-2023, Q1 round, Grass with Maddison Inglis getting the victory 6-3 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:23:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Inglis and Lumsden have played a deciding set 0 times, with Inglis winning 0 times and Lumsden 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Inglis winning 0, and Lumsden 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Inglis has played against opponents with an average rank of 293.86 while Lumsden has played against players with an average rank of 91.5.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Inglis has won 42% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Lumsden has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Inglis has converted 47.17% of breakpoint opportunities, and Lumsden has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
243
Rank
112
High
26
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
1
Grass0
863
Rank
250
High
26
Age
Plays
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
W
W
L
Form
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
L
59% (253-178)
Career Total W/L
55% (149-120)
63% (22-13)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$423,460
Career Prize Money
$3,400
2
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Maddison Inglis vs Maia Lumsden For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Inglis VS Lumsden
Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t win!
Welcome bonuses
First Deposit Doubled
(Up to $500 is doubled on initial deposit)
+
Regional Signup Bonuses
With competitive adds and live betting
| stats | Maddison Inglis | Maia Lumsden |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 6 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 4 |
| DFs Total | 3 | 7 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:23:0 | 1:23:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 69% (42/61) | 50% (33/66) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 69% (29/42) | 64% (21/33) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 37% (7/19) | 33% (11/33) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 60% (6/10) | 38% (3/8) |
| Return Points W% | 52% (34/66) | 41% (25/61) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-3 |
Stats 
Maddison Inglis
Player
Maia Lumsden
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve %
50%
(
33 of
66)
0
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
7
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
37%
(
7 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
11 of
33)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
41%
(
25 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
66)
70
Total Points Won
57
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Maddison Inglis | Maia Lumsden |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 63% (22/13) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 61% (51/33) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 55% (424/353) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 63% (12/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 69% (9/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.29 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 110 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.41 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 156 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:48:26 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 292.03 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (1469/2392) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 66% (970/1469) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 47% (431/923) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 47% (150/318) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 46% (1187/2601) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 67% (4/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 67% (18/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 63% (22/35) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 57% (4/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (7/14) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 81% (21/17) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 19% (21/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 36% (14/5) | 0% (0/0) |
Maddison Inglis Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Yuliia Starodubtseva
Player
Maddison Inglis
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve %
63%
(
33 of
52)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
7
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
86%
(
12 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
37
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Maddison Inglis
Player
Natalija Stevanovic
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve %
54%
(
30 of
56)
4
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
3
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
83%
(
10 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
20%
(
8 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
28 of
56)
61
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Maddison Inglis
Player
Sara Bejlek
65%
(
22 of
34)
1st Serve %
59%
(
22 of
37)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
77%
(
17 of
22)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
42%
(
5 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
35%
(
12 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
40
Total Points Won
31
|
6-4 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ranah Akua Stoiber
Player
Maddison Inglis
37%
(
14 of
38)
1st Serve %
72%
(
26 of
36)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
100%
(
14 of
14)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
9 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
51
Total Points Won
23
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ena Shibahara
Player
Maddison Inglis
63%
(
40 of
64)
1st Serve %
65%
(
42 of
65)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
83%
(
33 of
40)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
20 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
65)
73
Total Points Won
56
|
7-6(1) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Aoi Ito
Player
Maddison Inglis
65%
(
74 of
114)
1st Serve %
58%
(
52 of
89)
3
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
6
59%
(
44 of
74)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
32 of
52)
43%
(
17 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
46%
(
53 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
40 of
89)
101
Total Points Won
102
|
4-6 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Maddison Inglis
Player
Zongyu Li
60%
(
46 of
77)
1st Serve %
77%
(
67 of
87)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
78%
(
36 of
46)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
40 of
67)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
30%
(
23 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
36 of
87)
90
Total Points Won
74
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maddison Inglis
Player
Han Shi
69%
(
67 of
97)
1st Serve %
74%
(
89 of
120)
1
Aces
3
9
Double Faults
7
57%
(
38 of
67)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
48 of
89)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
42%
(
8 of
19)
Break Points Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
46%
(
45 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
60 of
120)
112
Total Points Won
105
|
5-7 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Miho Kuramochi
Player
Maddison Inglis
75%
(
79 of
106)
1st Serve %
58%
(
62 of
107)
-
Aces
-
7
Double Faults
8
62%
(
49 of
79)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
35 of
62)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
21 of
45)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
43%
(
46 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
51 of
107)
111
Total Points Won
102
|
4-6 6-3 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maddison Inglis
Player
Mayuka Aikawa
62%
(
39 of
63)
1st Serve %
79%
(
53 of
67)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
22 of
53)
21%
(
5 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
2 of
14)
50%
(
9 of
18)
Break Points Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
52%
(
33 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
43 of
67)
73
Total Points Won
57
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Maia Lumsden Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Despina Papamichail
Player
Maia Lumsden
61%
(
40 of
66)
1st Serve %
65%
(
54 of
83)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
60%
(
24 of
40)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
39%
(
26 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
41 of
83)
81
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sabine Lisicki
Player
Maia Lumsden
66%
(
49 of
74)
1st Serve %
57%
(
47 of
83)
6
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
6
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
31 of
47)
32%
(
8 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
13 of
36)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
45%
(
33 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
39 of
83)
80
Total Points Won
77
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Maddison Inglis
Player
Maia Lumsden
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve %
50%
(
33 of
66)
0
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
7
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
37%
(
7 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
11 of
33)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
41%
(
25 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
66)
70
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Oceane Dodin
Player
Maia Lumsden
54%
(
52 of
97)
1st Serve %
66%
(
60 of
91)
7
Aces
7
8
Double Faults
6
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
37 of
60)
56%
(
25 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
38%
(
37 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
39 of
91)
99
Total Points Won
89
|
7-5 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Maia Lumsden
Player
Danielle Daley
65%
(
42 of
65)
1st Serve %
51%
(
37 of
72)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
7
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
24 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
72)
74
Total Points Won
63
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Maia Lumsden
Player
Zhuoxuan Bai
66%
(
64 of
97)
1st Serve %
59%
(
46 of
78)
6
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
4
63%
(
40 of
64)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
39%
(
13 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
45%
(
44 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
36 of
78)
89
Total Points Won
86
|
3-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tatiana Prozorova
Player
Maia Lumsden
51%
(
21 of
41)
1st Serve %
49%
(
21 of
43)
0
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
7
76%
(
16 of
21)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
39%
(
16 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
51
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Maia Lumsden
Player
Ingrid Vojcinakova
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve %
59%
(
34 of
58)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
6
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
58)
62
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sofya Lansere
Player
Maia Lumsden
71%
(
45 of
63)
1st Serve %
44%
(
28 of
63)
5
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
7
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
28%
(
5 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
11 of
35)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
43%
(
27 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
35 of
63)
71
Total Points Won
55
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Maia Lumsden
Player
Veronika Erjavec
57%
(
43 of
76)
1st Serve %
64%
(
34 of
53)
4
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
3
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
42%
(
32 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
73
Total Points Won
56
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Inglis Vs Lumsden Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Inglis are available here and Lumsden photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
